Podcast Report of NI Week
I finally got around to recording another podcast–this one recapping NI Week.
I finally got around to recording another podcast–this one recapping NI Week.
Just learned of the passing of Ray Anderson. I was never able to hook up with him personally, but I quoted him extensively. He learned that sustainability was far deeper than a liberal buzzword. It was actually a great organizing principle for running a profitable manufacturing enterprise. His legacy lives on. Here’s the press release I just received.
Interface Founder and Chairman Ray Anderson, Visionary Entrepreneur and Champion for the Environment, has died at age 77
Atlanta, Georgia – “Interface and the world have lost a great man today,” said Dan Hendrix, President and Chief Executive Officer of Interface, announcing that Ray C. Anderson lost a 20-month battle with cancer today. Surrounded by his family, Ray died at his home in Atlanta.
Dan went on to say, “Ray was and continues to be our company’s heart and soul. His iconic spirit and pioneering vision are not only his legacy, but our future. We will honor Ray by keeping his vision alive and the Company on course.”
Ray’s story is now legend: the 1994 “spear in the chest” epiphany he experienced when he first read Paul Hawken’s The Ecology of Commerce, seeking inspiration for a speech to an Interface task force on the company’s environmental vision. Seventeen years and a sea change later, Ray estimated that Interface is more than half-way towards the vision of “Mission Zero,” the journey no one would have imagined for the company, or for the petroleum-intensive industry of carpet manufacturing, which has been forever changed by his vision.
Ray chronicled the Interface journey in two books, Mid-Course Correction (1998) and Confessions Of A Radical Industrialist (2009). The latter was recently released in paperback as Business Lessons from a Radical Industrialist.
An honors graduate of Georgia Institute of Technology’s school of industrial and systems engineering in 1956, Ray remained an ardent supporter of the school, which awarded him with an honorary doctorate of philosophy at last Friday’s summer commencement. Together, he and Interface funded the creation of the Anderson-Interface Chair in Natural Systems at Georgia Tech, where Associate Professor Valerie Thomas conducts research in sustainability.
Anderson founded Interface in 1973 to produce the first free-lay carpet tiles in America. Interface would revolutionize the commercial floorcovering business, but it is for that legendary environmental epiphany in 1994 that Ray will best be remembered.
Interface, Inc. is the world’s largest manufacturer of modular carpet, which it markets under the InterfaceFLOR, FLOR, Heuga and Bentley Prince Street brands, and, through its Bentley Prince Street brand, enjoys a leading position in the designer quality segment of the broadloom carpet market. The Company is committed to the goal of sustainability and doing business in ways that minimize the impact on the environment while enhancing shareholder value.
Sorry for the delay in posting. I’ve been thoroughly swamped getting back from Austin. It’s the usual mid-August–I have to find referees for another 52 soccer matches this season. Plus I contributed to the economy by buying a car. I practiced saying no for a while before going in to see the dealership finance manager.
My video recap of NI Week is live at Automation World.
Jobs
I’m putting together a post on jobs. I’ve written about Martin Ford in the past who is a pessimist on jobs. Jeff Jarvis just posted a pessimistic note about loss of jobs. Jason Calacanis responded with one of his usual grandiose ideas. What I’m pondering (comment now, and you can help shape my ideas)–in the ’50s and ’60s we had great prosperity with only one person earning a salary in most households. Then we encouraged women to enter the workforce, and they did in huge numbers. Simultaneously, the price per worker went down. This driven partly by Republican politics–it’s the usual boost income for my friends and decrease for my foes something all politicians seem to think. But it’s partly due to supply and demand.
So, what I’m wondering is–do we all need to work for a wage? What’s wrong with only one earner per household who can earn enough that the family can live a middle class life. The other person could work (since I do believe that work is fulfilling) on one of various agencies that do things to help people and not worry about earning $40K to keep the family in a house.
I keep wondering when National Instruments LabView will reach some sort of tipping point—especially in embedded programming. I can remember learning to program in C and how hard it was to keep track of the big picture while coding in the weeds. Not to mention how arcane relay ladder logic is. I’ve been fascinated by LabView since I first saw it in 1998. Problem is that it is proprietary. But it’s powerful, you can see at an abstraction layer beyond the details in order to keep the big picture in mind, and it’s dataflow model makes it ideal for parallel programming that can take advantage of today’s powerful multicore processors and FPGAs.
In honor of the 25th anniversary of LabView, here is a letter from Jeff Kodosky, NI Technical and Business Fellow, Co-Founder and Father of LabView.
Dear Industry Colleague,
LabVIEW is 25 this year, so it’s a perfect time to pause for reflection and to speculate on the future.
From the beginning, we thought we were on to something special. The first Mac had recently released, bringing with it the first mainstream GUI and mouse. We knew that personal computers held great potential for use by scientists and engineers, and we were confident that the GUI and mouse would be the primary way people would interact with their computers.
Our thoughts for LabVIEW were simply to combine the power of the PC with the expressiveness of the GUI and hide the unnecessary complications of programming. We wanted to provide a tool that would be as useful to scientists and engineers automating measurements as the spreadsheet was for people working with financial data. Nobody asked us to build LabVIEW. We made it with a “build it and they will come” mentality. We wanted to build a tool that offered a step-function improvement in productivity in designing test and measurement systems.
We didn’t set out to create the G programming language, but that’s where we ended up. We realized we needed that level of flexibility and control to enhance engineers’ productivity and support all of the types of I/O and processing our customers would require. After much deliberation, we settled on a graphical, structured dataflow representation that more closely resembled actual circuits and block diagrams compared to traditional forms of programming.
It’s rewarding to see the many ways our customers have used LabVIEW. From detecting cancer earlier to providing the blind with experiences once thought impossible. From conducting the most advanced experiments in the world that aim to uncover the mysteries of the universe to inspiring our children to be future technology leaders. In return, our customers inspire us to maintain our mission and provide them with continuous productivity improvements and access to the latest technologies.
Until now, most of what we’ve seen in the mainstream market are multiple homogenous cores on a single chip. Specialized processors like GPUs have been reserved for specific tasks and haven’t been readily accessible to programmers. Looking to future technologies, I expect to see more specialized processing cores working alongside general-purpose CPUs to meet the increasing demand for processing power. Additionally, as FPGAs evolve, they will become more prevalent and more capable. To harness the available power, engineers will need productive tools that assist them in partitioning and targeting logic to the appropriate processors. Once harnessed, this increased processing power will help engineers do in real time what they previously had to do offline.
Wireless and mobile technologies are prevalent in our everyday lives. These technologies make it possible to deploy intelligent, sensor-rich devices over large areas. Next-generation networking technologies like IPv6 and high-speed wireless networks promise to support what will become an enormous number of connected devices capable of acquiring and transferring unthinkable amounts of data. I expect we’ll see that this technology could ultimately help prevent hunger and disease, preserve natural resources and improve our quality of life by bringing in additional real-world data to be able to make more timely and better decisions and create more accurate models.
The way people interact with software is another area of rapid technological advancement. In the future, I imagine we’ll see much more efficient input mechanisms. Just as the mouse took over many input duties from the keyboard, I expect to see touch- and gesture-based input become a more prominent aspect of software interaction. Software will become more intuitive, reducing the learning curve as it continues to incorporate physical metaphors.
We made a decision 25 years ago to base the LabVIEW core programming language on structured data flow. The inherent parallelism of data flow was a natural fit for the acquisition-analysis-presentation problem our customers were solving. When the industry moved to multicore machines, that decision made us look downright prescient. Still today and in the future, LabVIEW is naturally positioned to integrate these next-generation technologies and many more that engineers and scientists will rely upon to meet the most difficult challenges they face. That being said, we still have a lot of work to do. As our mission is to equip our customers with tools that accelerate their productivity, innovation and discovery, we are excited to see what the future will bring.
The future is bright.
Jeff K
3,300 attendees greeted James Truchard, Ph.D. aka “Dr. T” and President and CEO of National Instruments, as he opened the 17th NI Week in Austin, Texas. CEOs of automation suppliers usually devote their keynotes to discussing company financials and competitive place in the market. True to the technology roots of NI, though, Dr. T gave an overview of technology development in the instrumentation area.
During his career in instrumentation he’s seen the driving force of technology last about 45 years. It started with vacuum tube technology then to transistors. Now software is the driving force.
Speaking of software, LabView is 25 years old. NI feels it has accomplished its original goal to do for scientists and engineers what the spreadsheet did for financial analysts. The next 25 years will see LabView expanding into system design. Dr. T built on that theme saying, “LabView will do for embedded what the PC did for the desktop.”
The theme of NI Week 2011 and LabView 2011 is productivity. Several executives took different approaches to explaining how. Dr. T stated the goal. Vice President of Product Marketing Eric Stakloff discussed how Graphical Systems Design, an abstraction description of LabView, accelerates development. He also gave the annual new product releases keynote to the usual applause of appreciative customers with every leap of technology announced. Vice President of Product Marketing-Core Products Ray Almgren discussed the increasing complexity of embedded devices such as mobile phones that makes programming in a sequential language such as C very difficult. The GSD approach provides a framework for visualizing and abstracting complex problems.
A few other bits of information. NI had 1,300 net new hires in the past year. It is investing $200 million in research and development.